← All regulations

Implementing Regulation · CELEX 32024R2690

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 — NIS2 Art 21(2) technical requirements

View official text on EUR-Lex →

48 obligations

NIS2-IMPL-1.1 · Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 — NIS2 Art 21(2) technical requirements, Annex §1.1

Network and information system security policy — required content and review

Maintain a single approved network-and-information-system security policy that sets out the entity's security approach, aligns with business strategy, states security objectives, commits to continual improvement and adequate resourcing, is communicated to staff and relevant external parties, lays down roles per §1.2, lists retained documentation and topic-specific policies, sets monitoring indicators, and is dated with management-body approval — reviewed at least annually or after a significant incident or change.

Applicable now
Applies to
Digital infrastructure/service entities in Art 3 scope (DNS providers, TLD registries, cloud/data-centre/CDN providers, MSPs/MSSPs, online marketplaces, search engines, social platforms, trust services)
Severity if failed
High
Applies from
6 Nov 2024
Source
NIS2-implementing-2024-2690.txt:2272-2517

How this is verified

  • A single management-approved N&IS security policy exists covering all eleven §1.1.1(a)-(k) elements, and has been reviewed at least annually or after a significant incident/change

    The annual-review cadence is the primary text's own stated threshold, not a draft placeholder.

Draft — pending expert review

Last verified against primary law 23 Jul 2026

NIS2-IMPL-1.2 · Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 — NIS2 Art 21(2) technical requirements, Annex §1.2

Roles, responsibilities and authorities for network and information system security

Assign and communicate network-and-information-system security responsibilities and authorities; require personnel and third parties to follow the security policy; ensure at least one person reports directly to the management body on security matters; size-appropriate dedicated or combined roles; segregate conflicting duties where applicable; review roles at planned intervals or after significant change.

Applicable now
Applies to
Digital infrastructure/service entities in Art 3 scope (DNS providers, TLD registries, cloud/data-centre/CDN providers, MSPs/MSSPs, online marketplaces, search engines, social platforms, trust services)
Severity if failed
High
Applies from
6 Nov 2024
Source
NIS2-implementing-2024-2690.txt:2524-2640

How this is verified

  • Security roles/authorities are assigned, communicated and reviewed at planned intervals, at least one person reports directly to the management body on N&IS security, and conflicting duties are segregated where applicable

    The 'planned intervals' cadence and what counts as 'applicable' segregation are draft placeholders pending compliance-expert definition.

Draft — pending expert review

Last verified against primary law 23 Jul 2026

NIS2-IMPL-10.1 · Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 — NIS2 Art 21(2) technical requirements, Annex §10.1

Human resources security responsibilities

Ensure employees and, where applicable per §5.1.4, direct suppliers and service providers understand and commit to their security responsibilities, appropriate to their role and service and in line with the N&IS security policy — via mechanisms ensuring standard cyber hygiene practices (§8.1) are understood and followed, administrative/privileged users act per their roles/responsibilities/authorities, management body members understand and act on their N&IS security role, and qualified personnel are hired for security-relevant roles (e.g. reference checks, vetting, certification validation, written tests). Personnel role assignments (per §1.2) and resourcing are reviewed at planned intervals and at least annually, updated where necessary.

Applicable now
Applies to
Digital infrastructure/service entities in Art 3 scope (DNS providers, TLD registries, cloud/data-centre/CDN providers, MSPs/MSSPs, online marketplaces, search engines, social platforms, trust services)
Severity if failed
Medium
Applies from
6 Nov 2024
Source
NIS2-implementing-2024-2690.txt:7567-7705

How this is verified

  • Mechanisms exist ensuring employees/suppliers understand security responsibilities per §10.1.2(a)-(d), and role assignments are reviewed at planned intervals and at least annually

    The specific hiring-verification mechanisms used are entity-defined — draft placeholder pending compliance-expert input.

Draft — pending expert review

Last verified against primary law 23 Jul 2026

NIS2-IMPL-10.2 · Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 — NIS2 Art 21(2) technical requirements, Annex §10.2

Background verification

To the extent feasible, verify the background of employees and, where applicable per §5.1.4, direct suppliers and service providers, where necessary for their role, responsibilities and authorisations — by setting criteria for which roles require verified backgrounds, and performing that verification before the person starts exercising the role, taking into account applicable laws, regulations and ethics, proportionate to business requirements, the §12.1 asset classification, the systems to be accessed, and perceived risk. The policy is reviewed and, where appropriate, updated at planned intervals.

Applicable now
Applies to
Digital infrastructure/service entities in Art 3 scope (DNS providers, TLD registries, cloud/data-centre/CDN providers, MSPs/MSSPs, online marketplaces, search engines, social platforms, trust services)
Severity if failed
Medium
Applies from
6 Nov 2024
Source
NIS2-implementing-2024-2690.txt:7706-7806

How this is verified

  • Criteria exist identifying which roles require background verification, verification is performed before role commencement proportionate to risk/asset classification, and the policy is reviewed at planned intervals

    The specific verification depth/method is jurisdiction- and role-dependent — draft placeholder pending compliance-expert definition.

Draft — pending expert review

Last verified against primary law 23 Jul 2026

NIS2-IMPL-10.3 · Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 — NIS2 Art 21(2) technical requirements, Annex §10.3

Termination or change of employment procedures

Ensure network and information system security responsibilities and duties that remain valid after termination or change of an employee's employment are contractually defined and enforced — including confidentiality clauses and similar terms written into the individual's employment terms, contract or agreement.

Applicable now
Applies to
Digital infrastructure/service entities in Art 3 scope (DNS providers, TLD registries, cloud/data-centre/CDN providers, MSPs/MSSPs, online marketplaces, search engines, social platforms, trust services)
Severity if failed
Medium
Applies from
6 Nov 2024
Source
NIS2-implementing-2024-2690.txt:7807-7849

How this is verified

  • Post-employment N&IS security responsibilities (e.g. confidentiality) are contractually defined and enforced in employment terms/contracts

    Specific contract clause language is left to the entity's legal function — draft placeholder pending compliance-expert input.

Draft — pending expert review

Last verified against primary law 23 Jul 2026

NIS2-IMPL-10.4 · Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 — NIS2 Art 21(2) technical requirements, Annex §10.4

Disciplinary process for security policy violations

Establish, communicate and maintain a disciplinary process for handling violations of network and information system security policies, taking into account relevant legal, statutory, contractual and business requirements. The process is reviewed and, where appropriate, updated at planned intervals and when necessary due to legal changes or significant operational/risk changes.

Applicable now
Applies to
Digital infrastructure/service entities in Art 3 scope (DNS providers, TLD registries, cloud/data-centre/CDN providers, MSPs/MSSPs, online marketplaces, search engines, social platforms, trust services)
Severity if failed
Medium
Applies from
6 Nov 2024
Source
NIS2-implementing-2024-2690.txt:7850-7892

How this is verified

  • A documented, communicated disciplinary process exists for N&IS security policy violations, accounting for legal/contractual/business requirements, and is reviewed at planned intervals or after legal/operational/risk changes

    Review cadence is entity-defined — draft placeholder pending compliance-expert input.

Draft — pending expert review

Last verified against primary law 23 Jul 2026

NIS2-IMPL-11.1 · Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 — NIS2 Art 21(2) technical requirements, Annex §11.1

Access control policy

Establish, document and implement logical and physical access control policies for network and information systems, based on business and N&IS security requirements — addressing access by persons (staff, visitors, external entities such as suppliers/service providers) and by network and information systems themselves, and ensuring access is only granted to adequately authenticated users. Policies are reviewed and, where appropriate, updated at planned intervals and after significant incidents or significant operational/risk changes.

Applicable now
Applies to
Digital infrastructure/service entities in Art 3 scope (DNS providers, TLD registries, cloud/data-centre/CDN providers, MSPs/MSSPs, online marketplaces, search engines, social platforms, trust services)
Severity if failed
High
Applies from
6 Nov 2024
Source
NIS2-implementing-2024-2690.txt:7896-8015

How this is verified

  • Documented logical/physical access control policies exist covering person, system and authenticated-access requirements per §11.1.2(a)-(c), and are reviewed at planned intervals or after significant incidents/changes

    Review cadence is entity-defined — draft placeholder pending compliance-expert input.

Draft — pending expert review

Last verified against primary law 23 Jul 2026

NIS2-IMPL-11.2 · Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 — NIS2 Art 21(2) technical requirements, Annex §11.2

Management of access rights

Provide, modify, remove and document access rights to network and information systems in accordance with the §11.1 access control policy — assigning and revoking rights based on need-to-know, least privilege and separation of duties; modifying access upon termination or change of employment; ensuring access is authorised by the relevant persons; appropriately addressing third-party access (visitors, suppliers, service providers) by limiting scope and duration; maintaining a register of granted access rights; and applying logging to access-rights management. Access rights are reviewed at planned intervals, modified based on organisational changes, with review results and necessary changes documented.

Applicable now
Applies to
Digital infrastructure/service entities in Art 3 scope (DNS providers, TLD registries, cloud/data-centre/CDN providers, MSPs/MSSPs, online marketplaces, search engines, social platforms, trust services)
Severity if failed
High
Applies from
6 Nov 2024
Source
NIS2-implementing-2024-2690.txt:8016-8192

How this is verified

  • Access rights are assigned/modified/removed per §11.2.2(a)-(f) (need-to-know, least privilege, separation of duties, termination handling, authorisation, third-party limits, a maintained register, and logging), and reviewed at planned intervals with documented results

    Review cadence is entity-defined — draft placeholder pending compliance-expert input.

Draft — pending expert review

Last verified against primary law 23 Jul 2026

NIS2-IMPL-11.3 · Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 — NIS2 Art 21(2) technical requirements, Annex §11.3

Privileged accounts and system administration accounts

Maintain policies for managing privileged accounts and system administration accounts as part of the §11.1 access control policy — establishing strong identification/authentication (e.g. multi-factor) and authorisation procedures for such accounts; setting up dedicated accounts used exclusively for system administration operations (installation, configuration, management, maintenance); individualising and restricting administration privileges to the highest extent possible; and ensuring administration accounts are only used to connect to system administration systems. Access rights of privileged/administration accounts are reviewed at planned intervals, modified based on organisational changes, with review results documented.

Applicable now
Applies to
Digital infrastructure/service entities in Art 3 scope (DNS providers, TLD registries, cloud/data-centre/CDN providers, MSPs/MSSPs, online marketplaces, search engines, social platforms, trust services)
Severity if failed
High
Applies from
6 Nov 2024
Source
NIS2-implementing-2024-2690.txt:8193-8331

How this is verified

  • Privileged/administration-account policies exist covering §11.3.2(a)-(d) (strong auth, dedicated accounts, individualised/restricted privileges, exclusive use for administration systems), and access rights are reviewed at planned intervals with documented results

    Review cadence is entity-defined — draft placeholder pending compliance-expert input.

Draft — pending expert review

Last verified against primary law 23 Jul 2026

NIS2-IMPL-11.4 · Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 — NIS2 Art 21(2) technical requirements, Annex §11.4

Restriction and control of system administration systems

Restrict and control the use of system administration systems in accordance with the §11.1 access control policy — using them only for system administration purposes and no other operations, logically separating them from application software not used for administration, and protecting access to them through authentication and encryption.

Applicable now
Applies to
Digital infrastructure/service entities in Art 3 scope (DNS providers, TLD registries, cloud/data-centre/CDN providers, MSPs/MSSPs, online marketplaces, search engines, social platforms, trust services)
Severity if failed
High
Applies from
6 Nov 2024
Source
NIS2-implementing-2024-2690.txt:8332-8431

How this is verified

  • System administration systems are used exclusively for administration purposes, logically separated from other application software, and access-protected via authentication and encryption

    The specific separation/encryption mechanism is entity-defined — draft placeholder pending compliance-expert input.

Draft — pending expert review

Last verified against primary law 23 Jul 2026

NIS2-IMPL-11.5 · Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 — NIS2 Art 21(2) technical requirements, Annex §11.5

Identity lifecycle management

Manage the full life cycle of identities for network and information systems and their users — setting up unique identities for systems and users, linking each user identity to a single person, ensuring oversight of system identities, and applying logging to identity management. Identities assigned to multiple persons (e.g. shared identities) are only permitted where necessary for business or operational reasons, subject to explicit approval, documentation, and inclusion in the §2.1 risk management framework. Identities are regularly reviewed and deactivated without delay once no longer needed.

Applicable now
Applies to
Digital infrastructure/service entities in Art 3 scope (DNS providers, TLD registries, cloud/data-centre/CDN providers, MSPs/MSSPs, online marketplaces, search engines, social platforms, trust services)
Severity if failed
High
Applies from
6 Nov 2024
Source
NIS2-implementing-2024-2690.txt:8432-8590

How this is verified

  • Unique identities exist for systems/users with each user identity linked to a single person, identity management is logged, shared identities (if any) are explicitly approved/documented/risk-assessed, and identities are regularly reviewed with no-longer-needed identities deactivated without delay

    Review cadence ('regularly') is entity-defined — draft placeholder pending compliance-expert input.

Draft — pending expert review

Last verified against primary law 23 Jul 2026

NIS2-IMPL-11.6 · Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 — NIS2 Art 21(2) technical requirements, Annex §11.6

Authentication procedures and technologies

Implement secure authentication procedures and technologies based on access restrictions and the access control policy — ensuring authentication strength matches the classification of the asset accessed; controlling allocation/management of secret authentication information to preserve confidentiality (including personnel guidance on handling it); requiring credential changes initially, at predefined intervals, and upon suspected compromise; resetting credentials and blocking users after a predefined number of failed login attempts; terminating inactive sessions after a predefined inactivity period; and requiring separate credentials for privileged/administrative access. To the extent feasible, state-of-the-art authentication methods and unique authentication information are used, matched to assessed risk and asset classification. Procedures and technologies are reviewed at planned intervals.

Applicable now
Applies to
Digital infrastructure/service entities in Art 3 scope (DNS providers, TLD registries, cloud/data-centre/CDN providers, MSPs/MSSPs, online marketplaces, search engines, social platforms, trust services)
Severity if failed
High
Applies from
6 Nov 2024
Source
NIS2-implementing-2024-2690.txt:8591-8787

How this is verified

  • Authentication procedures cover §11.6.2(a)-(f) (risk-matched strength, protected credential handling, credential rotation/reset-on-lockout, session timeout, separate privileged credentials), use state-of-the-art methods where feasible, and are reviewed at planned intervals

    The specific 'predefined' thresholds (rotation interval, lockout count, inactivity timeout) are entity-defined — draft placeholders pending compliance-expert definition.

Draft — pending expert review

Last verified against primary law 23 Jul 2026

NIS2-IMPL-12.1 · Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 — NIS2 Art 21(2) technical requirements, Annex §12.1

Asset classification

Lay down classification levels for all assets (including information) in scope of network and information systems, indicating the level of protection required — establishing a classification-level system, associating every asset with a level based on confidentiality/integrity/authenticity/availability requirements reflecting sensitivity, criticality, risk and business value, and aligning asset availability requirements with the delivery/recovery objectives set in the §4.1 business continuity/disaster recovery plans. Classification levels are periodically reviewed and updated where appropriate.

Applicable now
Applies to
Digital infrastructure/service entities in Art 3 scope (DNS providers, TLD registries, cloud/data-centre/CDN providers, MSPs/MSSPs, online marketplaces, search engines, social platforms, trust services)
Severity if failed
High
Applies from
6 Nov 2024
Source
NIS2-implementing-2024-2690.txt:8834-8953

How this is verified

  • A classification-level system exists, every in-scope asset is associated with a level per §12.1.2(b), availability requirements align with BC/DR objectives, and classification levels are periodically reviewed

    Review cadence ('periodic') is entity-defined — draft placeholder pending compliance-expert input.

Draft — pending expert review

Last verified against primary law 23 Jul 2026

NIS2-IMPL-12.2 · Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 — NIS2 Art 21(2) technical requirements, Annex §12.2

Handling of assets

Establish, implement and apply a policy for the proper handling of assets (including information), in line with the N&IS security policy, communicated to anyone who uses or handles assets — covering the entire asset life cycle (acquisition, use, storage, transportation, disposal), providing rules for safe use/storage/transport and irretrievable deletion/destruction, and ensuring secure transfer appropriate to the asset type. Reviewed and, where appropriate, updated at planned intervals and after significant incidents or significant operational/risk changes.

Applicable now
Applies to
Digital infrastructure/service entities in Art 3 scope (DNS providers, TLD registries, cloud/data-centre/CDN providers, MSPs/MSSPs, online marketplaces, search engines, social platforms, trust services)
Severity if failed
Medium
Applies from
6 Nov 2024
Source
NIS2-implementing-2024-2690.txt:8954-9073

How this is verified

  • A documented, communicated asset-handling policy exists covering the full asset life cycle per §12.2.2(a)-(c), and is reviewed at planned intervals or after significant incidents/changes

    Review cadence is entity-defined — draft placeholder pending compliance-expert input.

Draft — pending expert review

Last verified against primary law 23 Jul 2026

NIS2-IMPL-12.3 · Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 — NIS2 Art 21(2) technical requirements, Annex §12.3

Removable media policy

Establish, implement and apply a policy on managing removable storage media, communicated to employees and third parties who handle such media at the entity's premises or wherever it connects to the entity's network and information systems — technically prohibiting removable-media connection absent an organisational reason, disabling self-execution and scanning media for malicious code before use, controlling/protecting portable storage devices in transit and storage, and, where appropriate, using cryptographic techniques to protect data on removable media. Reviewed and, where appropriate, updated at planned intervals and after significant incidents or significant operational/risk changes.

Applicable now
Applies to
Digital infrastructure/service entities in Art 3 scope (DNS providers, TLD registries, cloud/data-centre/CDN providers, MSPs/MSSPs, online marketplaces, search engines, social platforms, trust services)
Severity if failed
Medium
Applies from
6 Nov 2024
Source
NIS2-implementing-2024-2690.txt:9074-9212

How this is verified

  • A documented, communicated removable-media policy exists covering §12.3.2(a)-(d) (technical restriction, malware scanning/no self-execution, transit/storage protection, cryptographic protection where appropriate), and is reviewed at planned intervals or after significant incidents/changes

    Review cadence is entity-defined — draft placeholder pending compliance-expert input.

Draft — pending expert review

Last verified against primary law 23 Jul 2026

NIS2-IMPL-12.4 · Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 — NIS2 Art 21(2) technical requirements, Annex §12.4

Asset inventory

Develop and maintain a complete, accurate, up-to-date and consistent inventory of assets, with changes to inventory entries recorded traceably. Inventory granularity is appropriate to the entity's needs and includes the list of operations/services and their description, and the list of network and information systems and other associated assets supporting those operations/services. The inventory and its assets are regularly reviewed and updated, with a documented history of changes.

Applicable now
Applies to
Digital infrastructure/service entities in Art 3 scope (DNS providers, TLD registries, cloud/data-centre/CDN providers, MSPs/MSSPs, online marketplaces, search engines, social platforms, trust services)
Severity if failed
High
Applies from
6 Nov 2024
Source
NIS2-implementing-2024-2690.txt:9213-9313

How this is verified

  • A complete, accurate, up-to-date asset inventory exists covering §12.4.2(a)-(b) (operations/services and their supporting systems/assets), with traceably recorded changes and a regular review/update cadence

    Review cadence ('regularly') is entity-defined — draft placeholder pending compliance-expert input.

Draft — pending expert review

Last verified against primary law 23 Jul 2026

NIS2-IMPL-12.5 · Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 — NIS2 Art 21(2) technical requirements, Annex §12.5

Deposit, return or deletion of assets upon termination of employment

Establish, implement and apply procedures ensuring assets under personnel custody are deposited, returned or deleted upon termination of employment, with the deposit/return/deletion documented. Where deposit, return or deletion isn't possible, ensure those assets can no longer access the entity's network and information systems, per §12.2.2.

Applicable now
Applies to
Digital infrastructure/service entities in Art 3 scope (DNS providers, TLD registries, cloud/data-centre/CDN providers, MSPs/MSSPs, online marketplaces, search engines, social platforms, trust services)
Severity if failed
Medium
Applies from
6 Nov 2024
Source
NIS2-implementing-2024-2690.txt:9314-9318

How this is verified

  • Documented procedures ensure custodied assets are deposited/returned/deleted at termination with the action documented, or — where not possible — the asset's system access is revoked per §12.2.2

    None beyond the primary text's own explicit fallback requirement.

Draft — pending expert review

Last verified against primary law 23 Jul 2026

NIS2-IMPL-13.1 · Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 — NIS2 Art 21(2) technical requirements, Annex §13.1

Protection of supporting utilities

Prevent loss, damage or compromise of network and information systems, or interruption to operations, from failure or disruption of supporting utilities — where appropriate, protecting facilities from power failures and other utility disruptions (electricity, telecommunications, water, gas, sewage, ventilation, air conditioning); considering utility-service redundancy; protecting electricity/telecommunications utility services carrying data or supplying systems against interception and damage; monitoring those services and reporting threshold-breaching events to competent personnel; concluding emergency-supply contracts (e.g. fuel for emergency power); and ensuring continuous effectiveness through monitoring, maintenance and testing of the supply (electricity, temperature/humidity control, telecommunications, Internet connection). Protection measures are tested, reviewed and, where appropriate, updated regularly or after significant incidents or significant operational/risk changes.

Applicable now
Applies to
Digital infrastructure/service entities in Art 3 scope (DNS providers, TLD registries, cloud/data-centre/CDN providers, MSPs/MSSPs, online marketplaces, search engines, social platforms, trust services)
Severity if failed
High
Applies from
6 Nov 2024
Source
NIS2-implementing-2024-2690.txt:9322-9498

How this is verified

  • Supporting-utility protection measures exist covering the applicable §13.1.2(a)-(f) elements, and are tested/reviewed regularly or after significant incidents/changes

    Which measures are 'appropriate' and the test/review cadence are entity-specific — draft placeholders pending compliance-expert definition.

Draft — pending expert review

Last verified against primary law 23 Jul 2026

NIS2-IMPL-13.2 · Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 — NIS2 Art 21(2) technical requirements, Annex §13.2

Protection against physical and environmental threats

Prevent or reduce the consequences of events from physical and environmental threats (natural disasters and other intentional or unintentional threats), based on the §2.1 risk assessment — where appropriate, designing and implementing protection measures, determining minimum/maximum control thresholds for physical/environmental threats, and monitoring environmental parameters with reporting to competent personnel on threshold breaches. Protection measures are tested, reviewed and, where appropriate, updated regularly or after significant incidents or significant operational/risk changes.

Applicable now
Applies to
Digital infrastructure/service entities in Art 3 scope (DNS providers, TLD registries, cloud/data-centre/CDN providers, MSPs/MSSPs, online marketplaces, search engines, social platforms, trust services)
Severity if failed
High
Applies from
6 Nov 2024
Source
NIS2-implementing-2024-2690.txt:9499-9618

How this is verified

  • Risk-assessment-based physical/environmental threat protection measures exist per §13.2.2(a)-(c) (design/implementation, control thresholds, monitoring with breach reporting), and are tested/reviewed regularly or after significant incidents/changes

    Threshold values and test/review cadence are entity-specific — draft placeholders pending compliance-expert definition.

Draft — pending expert review

Last verified against primary law 23 Jul 2026

NIS2-IMPL-13.3 · Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 — NIS2 Art 21(2) technical requirements, Annex §13.3

Perimeter and physical access control

Prevent and monitor unauthorised physical access, damage and interference to network and information systems — laying down and using risk-assessment-based security perimeters to protect areas housing systems and associated assets; protecting those areas with appropriate entry controls and access points; designing and implementing physical security for offices, rooms and facilities; and continuously monitoring premises for unauthorised physical access. Physical access control measures are tested, reviewed and, where appropriate, updated regularly or after significant incidents or significant operational/risk changes.

Applicable now
Applies to
Digital infrastructure/service entities in Art 3 scope (DNS providers, TLD registries, cloud/data-centre/CDN providers, MSPs/MSSPs, online marketplaces, search engines, social platforms, trust services)
Severity if failed
High
Applies from
6 Nov 2024
Source
NIS2-implementing-2024-2690.txt:9619-9762

How this is verified

  • Risk-assessment-based security perimeters, entry controls and continuous physical-access monitoring exist per §13.3.2(a)-(d), and physical access control measures are tested/reviewed regularly or after significant incidents/changes

    Perimeter definitions and test/review cadence are entity-specific — draft placeholders pending compliance-expert definition.

Draft — pending expert review

Last verified against primary law 23 Jul 2026

NIS2-IMPL-2.1 · Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 — NIS2 Art 21(2) technical requirements, Annex §2.1

Risk management framework and cybersecurity risk management process

Establish and maintain a risk management framework and a documented cybersecurity risk management process — following a defined methodology, risk tolerance and risk criteria, identifying risks with an all-hazards approach (including third-party and single-point-of-failure risk), analysing and evaluating them, prioritising and monitoring treatment, and documenting the risk treatment plan with justified residual-risk acceptance — reviewed at least annually or after significant change.

Applicable now
Applies to
Digital infrastructure/service entities in Art 3 scope (DNS providers, TLD registries, cloud/data-centre/CDN providers, MSPs/MSSPs, online marketplaces, search engines, social platforms, trust services)
Severity if failed
High
Applies from
6 Nov 2024
Source
NIS2-implementing-2024-2690.txt:2650-2916

How this is verified

  • A documented risk management framework and cybersecurity risk management process exist, risk assessments and a risk treatment plan are current, and both have been reviewed at least annually

    The annual-review cadence is explicit in §2.1.4; the specific risk-criteria/tolerance thresholds an entity sets for itself are pending compliance-expert input.

Draft — pending expert review

Last verified against primary law 23 Jul 2026

NIS2-IMPL-2.2 · Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 — NIS2 Art 21(2) technical requirements, Annex §2.2

Compliance monitoring

Regularly review compliance with the security policy, topic-specific policies, rules and standards, and inform the management body of the current security status through regular reporting via an effective compliance reporting system, at planned intervals or after significant incidents/changes.

Applicable now
Applies to
Digital infrastructure/service entities in Art 3 scope (DNS providers, TLD registries, cloud/data-centre/CDN providers, MSPs/MSSPs, online marketplaces, search engines, social platforms, trust services)
Severity if failed
Medium
Applies from
6 Nov 2024
Source
NIS2-implementing-2024-2690.txt:2923-2979

How this is verified

  • Compliance reviews are performed at planned intervals with results reported to the management body via a functioning compliance reporting system

    The review cadence ('planned intervals') is left to the entity to define — draft placeholder pending compliance-expert input on a concrete default.

Draft — pending expert review

Last verified against primary law 23 Jul 2026

NIS2-IMPL-2.3 · Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 — NIS2 Art 21(2) technical requirements, Annex §2.3

Independent review of network and information system security

Independently review the approach to managing network-and-information-system security (people, processes, technology), carried out by reviewers with appropriate audit competence who are impartial and outside the line of authority of the area reviewed (or via alternative safeguards where the entity is too small for that separation), at planned intervals or after significant incidents/changes, with results — including compliance-monitoring and measurement output — reported to the management body.

Applicable now
Applies to
Digital infrastructure/service entities in Art 3 scope (DNS providers, TLD registries, cloud/data-centre/CDN providers, MSPs/MSSPs, online marketplaces, search engines, social platforms, trust services)
Severity if failed
Medium
Applies from
6 Nov 2024
Source
NIS2-implementing-2024-2690.txt:2986-3062

How this is verified

  • Independent, impartial reviews of N&IS security (people, processes, technology) are conducted at planned intervals by competent reviewers, with results reported to the management body and corrective actions tracked

    Review cadence and 'appropriate audit competence' criteria are draft placeholders pending compliance-expert definition.

Draft — pending expert review

Last verified against primary law 23 Jul 2026

NIS2-IMPL-3.1 · Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 — NIS2 Art 21(2) technical requirements, Annex §3.1

Incident handling policy — roles, responsibilities and procedures

Establish and implement an incident handling policy that lays down roles, responsibilities and procedures for detecting, analysing, containing, responding to, recovering from, documenting and reporting incidents in a timely manner. The policy must be coherent with the business continuity and disaster recovery plan (§4.1), and include an incident categorisation system consistent with event assessment (§3.4.1), effective communication/escalation/reporting plans, role assignments to competent employees, and supporting documents (response manuals, escalation charts, contact lists, templates) — tested, reviewed and, where appropriate, updated at planned intervals and after significant incidents or changes.

Applicable now
Applies to
Digital infrastructure/service entities in Art 3 scope (DNS providers, TLD registries, cloud/data-centre/CDN providers, MSPs/MSSPs, online marketplaces, search engines, social platforms, trust services)
Severity if failed
High
Applies from
6 Nov 2024
Source
NIS2-implementing-2024-2690.txt:3072-3210

How this is verified

  • A single incident handling policy exists covering detection, analysis, containment, response, recovery, documentation and reporting roles/procedures, is coherent with the business continuity plan, and has been tested/reviewed at planned intervals or after a significant incident/change

    The 'planned intervals' testing/review cadence is left to the entity to define — draft placeholder pending compliance-expert input on a concrete default.

Draft — pending expert review

Last verified against primary law 23 Jul 2026

NIS2-IMPL-3.2 · Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 — NIS2 Art 21(2) technical requirements, Annex §3.2

Monitoring and logging of network and information systems

Lay down procedures and use tools to monitor and log activity on network and information systems to detect events that could be incidents, minimising false positives/negatives and automating monitoring where feasible. Maintain, document and review logs covering — where appropriate, per the entity's own risk-based asset list — network traffic, user/permission changes, system and application access, authentication events, privileged/admin activity, configuration and backup changes, security-tool logs, resource usage, physical access, network-equipment access, log activation/pausing, and environmental events; reviewed regularly for unusual trends, with alarm thresholds triggering a timely qualified response. Logs must be backed up, protected from unauthorised access/change, time-synchronised across systems, and monitoring/logging systems kept redundant with availability monitored independently.

Applicable now
Applies to
Digital infrastructure/service entities in Art 3 scope (DNS providers, TLD registries, cloud/data-centre/CDN providers, MSPs/MSSPs, online marketplaces, search engines, social platforms, trust services)
Severity if failed
High
Applies from
6 Nov 2024
Source
NIS2-implementing-2024-2690.txt:3211-3581

How this is verified

  • Monitoring and logging procedures and tools are in place covering the applicable §3.2.3(a)-(l) log categories per the entity's own risk-based asset list, logs are reviewed regularly with alarm thresholds configured, and logs are backed up, access-protected and time-synchronised

    Which of the twelve §3.2.3 log categories are 'appropriate' depends on the entity's own risk assessment (§2.1) — the applicable subset and retention period are draft placeholders pending compliance-expert definition.

Draft — pending expert review

Last verified against primary law 23 Jul 2026

NIS2-IMPL-3.3 · Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 — NIS2 Art 21(2) technical requirements, Annex §3.3

Event reporting mechanism for employees, suppliers and customers

Put in place a simple mechanism allowing employees, suppliers and customers to report suspicious events, communicate that mechanism to suppliers and customers where appropriate, and regularly train employees on how to use it.

Applicable now
Applies to
Digital infrastructure/service entities in Art 3 scope (DNS providers, TLD registries, cloud/data-centre/CDN providers, MSPs/MSSPs, online marketplaces, search engines, social platforms, trust services)
Severity if failed
Medium
Applies from
6 Nov 2024
Source
NIS2-implementing-2024-2690.txt:3582-3624

How this is verified

  • A simple suspicious-event reporting mechanism exists, is communicated to suppliers/customers where appropriate, and employees receive regular training on its use

    Training frequency ('regularly') is left to the entity to define — draft placeholder pending compliance-expert input.

Draft — pending expert review

Last verified against primary law 23 Jul 2026

NIS2-IMPL-3.4 · Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 — NIS2 Art 21(2) technical requirements, Annex §3.4

Event assessment and classification

Assess suspicious events against predefined criteria to determine whether they constitute incidents and, if so, their nature and severity — using triage to prioritise containment/eradication, reviewing relevant logs, correlating and analysing them, assessing recurring incidents on a quarterly basis, and reassessing/reclassifying events as new information becomes available.

Applicable now
Applies to
Digital infrastructure/service entities in Art 3 scope (DNS providers, TLD registries, cloud/data-centre/CDN providers, MSPs/MSSPs, online marketplaces, search engines, social platforms, trust services)
Severity if failed
High
Applies from
6 Nov 2024
Source
NIS2-implementing-2024-2690.txt:3625-3762

How this is verified

  • Suspicious events are assessed against predefined criteria with documented triage, relevant logs are reviewed and correlated, recurring incidents are assessed quarterly, and events are reassessed as new information emerges

    The predefined assessment criteria and severity thresholds are entity-specific — draft placeholder pending compliance-expert definition.

Draft — pending expert review

Last verified against primary law 23 Jul 2026

NIS2-IMPL-3.5 · Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 — NIS2 Art 21(2) technical requirements, Annex §3.5

Incident response — containment, eradication and recovery

Respond to incidents in a timely manner per documented procedures covering containment (preventing spread), eradication (preventing recurrence) and recovery. Establish communication plans and procedures with CSIRTs/competent authorities for incident notification and for internal/external stakeholder communication during an incident. Log incident response activities and record evidence, and test incident response procedures at planned intervals.

Applicable now
Applies to
Digital infrastructure/service entities in Art 3 scope (DNS providers, TLD registries, cloud/data-centre/CDN providers, MSPs/MSSPs, online marketplaces, search engines, social platforms, trust services)
Severity if failed
Critical
Applies from
6 Nov 2024
Source
NIS2-implementing-2024-2690.txt:3763-3960

How this is verified

  • Documented incident response procedures covering containment, eradication and recovery exist and are followed in a timely manner, CSIRT/competent-authority and internal/external communication plans exist, response activities are logged with evidence retained, and procedures are tested at planned intervals

    The test cadence ('planned intervals') and 'timely manner' threshold are entity-defined — draft placeholders pending compliance-expert input.

Draft — pending expert review

Last verified against primary law 23 Jul 2026

NIS2-IMPL-3.6 · Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 — NIS2 Art 21(2) technical requirements, Annex §3.6

Post-incident reviews and lessons learned

Where appropriate, carry out post-incident reviews after recovery to identify the root cause and produce documented lessons learned that reduce the occurrence and consequences of future incidents, feeding improvements back into network/information security, risk treatment, and incident handling/detection/response procedures — reviewing at planned intervals whether incidents led to post-incident reviews.

Applicable now
Applies to
Digital infrastructure/service entities in Art 3 scope (DNS providers, TLD registries, cloud/data-centre/CDN providers, MSPs/MSSPs, online marketplaces, search engines, social platforms, trust services)
Severity if failed
Medium
Applies from
6 Nov 2024
Source
NIS2-implementing-2024-2690.txt:3961-4023

How this is verified

  • Post-incident reviews are carried out where appropriate after recovery, identify root cause with documented lessons learned, and feed back into security/risk-treatment/incident-handling procedures

    The entity itself determines when a review is 'appropriate' — draft placeholder pending compliance-expert definition of a concrete trigger threshold (e.g. severity tier).

Draft — pending expert review

Last verified against primary law 23 Jul 2026

NIS2-IMPL-4.1 · Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 — NIS2 Art 21(2) technical requirements, Annex §4.1

Business continuity and disaster recovery plan

Lay down and maintain a business continuity and disaster recovery plan for incidents, based on the §2.1 risk assessment, covering purpose/scope/audience, roles and responsibilities, key contacts and communication channels, activation/deactivation conditions, recovery order, per-operation recovery plans with objectives, required resources (backups and redundancies), and restoring/resuming activities from temporary measures. A business impact analysis shall assess the potential impact of severe disruptions and establish continuity requirements for network and information systems. The plan is tested, reviewed and, where appropriate, updated at planned intervals and after significant incidents or changes, incorporating lessons learnt.

Applicable now
Applies to
Digital infrastructure/service entities in Art 3 scope (DNS providers, TLD registries, cloud/data-centre/CDN providers, MSPs/MSSPs, online marketplaces, search engines, social platforms, trust services)
Severity if failed
Critical
Applies from
6 Nov 2024
Source
NIS2-implementing-2024-2690.txt:4027-4261

How this is verified

  • A risk-assessment-based business continuity/disaster recovery plan exists covering the §4.1.2(a)-(h) elements, a business impact analysis has established continuity requirements, and the plan has been tested/reviewed at planned intervals or after a significant incident/change, incorporating lessons learnt

    The 'planned intervals' test/review cadence is left to the entity to define — draft placeholder pending compliance-expert input.

Draft — pending expert review

Last verified against primary law 23 Jul 2026

NIS2-IMPL-4.2 · Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 — NIS2 Art 21(2) technical requirements, Annex §4.2

Backup and redundancy management

Maintain data backup copies and sufficient redundant resources (facilities, network and information systems, staff). Lay down backup plans covering recovery times, backup completeness/accuracy (including data held in cloud environments), safe offline/online storage at a location distant enough to escape a disaster at the main site, physical/logical access controls matched to asset classification, restoration procedures, and retention periods based on business and regulatory requirements. Perform regular backup integrity checks; ensure at least partial redundancy of systems, assets, personnel and communication channels based on the risk assessment and continuity plan; keep resource monitoring and adjustment informed by backup/redundancy requirements; and regularly test recovery of backups and redundancies, documenting results and taking corrective action where needed.

Applicable now
Applies to
Digital infrastructure/service entities in Art 3 scope (DNS providers, TLD registries, cloud/data-centre/CDN providers, MSPs/MSSPs, online marketplaces, search engines, social platforms, trust services)
Severity if failed
Critical
Applies from
6 Nov 2024
Source
NIS2-implementing-2024-2690.txt:4262-4574

How this is verified

  • Backup plans exist covering recovery times, completeness/accuracy, safe offsite storage, classification-based access controls and retention periods; backup integrity is checked regularly; systems/assets/personnel/communications have at least partial redundancy; and recovery of backups and redundancies is tested regularly with results documented

    The 'appropriate level of redundancy' and integrity-check/recovery-test cadence are left to the entity's own risk assessment — draft placeholders pending compliance-expert definition.

Draft — pending expert review

Last verified against primary law 23 Jul 2026

NIS2-IMPL-4.3 · Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 — NIS2 Art 21(2) technical requirements, Annex §4.3

Crisis management process

Put in place a crisis management process addressing personnel and, where appropriate, supplier/service-provider role allocation with specific steps to follow in crisis situations; appropriate communication channels with relevant competent authorities, covering both obligatory communications (e.g. incident reports and related timelines) and non-obligatory communications; and measures to maintain network and information system security during crises. Implement a process for managing and using information received from CSIRTs or competent authorities about incidents, vulnerabilities, threats or possible mitigation measures. Test, review and, where appropriate, update the crisis management plan on a regular basis or following significant incidents or significant changes to operations or risks.

Applicable now
Applies to
Digital infrastructure/service entities in Art 3 scope (DNS providers, TLD registries, cloud/data-centre/CDN providers, MSPs/MSSPs, online marketplaces, search engines, social platforms, trust services)
Severity if failed
High
Applies from
6 Nov 2024
Source
NIS2-implementing-2024-2690.txt:4575-4716

How this is verified

  • A crisis management process exists covering role allocation, competent-authority communication channels (obligatory and non-obligatory), and security-maintenance measures during crises; a process exists for using CSIRT/competent-authority threat information; and the plan is tested/reviewed regularly or after a significant incident/change

    The test/review cadence ('regular basis') is left to the entity to define — draft placeholder pending compliance-expert input.

Draft — pending expert review

Last verified against primary law 23 Jul 2026

NIS2-IMPL-5.1 · Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 — NIS2 Art 21(2) technical requirements, Annex §5.1

Supply chain security policy — supplier selection, contracts and review

Establish, implement and apply a supply chain security policy governing direct suppliers and service providers to mitigate identified network-and-information-system security risks; identify the entity's own role in the supply chain and communicate it to those suppliers. The policy sets supplier/service-provider selection and contracting criteria — cybersecurity practices (including secure development), ability to meet the entity's cybersecurity specifications, ICT product/service quality, resilience and risk classification, and supply diversification/anti-lock-in where applicable — taking into account any Article 22(1) coordinated supply-chain risk assessments where applicable. Based on the policy and the §2.1 risk assessment, contracts/SLAs specify, where appropriate: cybersecurity requirements (including §6.1 acquisition requirements), supplier-staff awareness/training/certification requirements, background-verification requirements, prompt incident-notification obligations, audit or audit-report rights, vulnerability-handling obligations, subcontracting requirements, and contract-termination obligations (e.g. data retrieval/disposal). These elements feed both new-supplier selection and the §6.1 procurement process; the policy and supplier practice are reviewed, monitored and acted on at planned intervals and after significant operational/risk changes or supplier-related incidents — including regular SLA-report monitoring, incident review, unscheduled-review assessment, and timely risk mitigation for ICT product/service changes.

Applicable now
Applies to
Digital infrastructure/service entities in Art 3 scope (DNS providers, TLD registries, cloud/data-centre/CDN providers, MSPs/MSSPs, online marketplaces, search engines, social platforms, trust services)
Severity if failed
High
Applies from
6 Nov 2024
Source
NIS2-implementing-2024-2690.txt:4720-5166

How this is verified

  • A supply chain security policy exists identifying the entity's role and communicating it to direct suppliers, sets selection/contracting criteria covering §5.1.2(a)-(d), and results in contracts/SLAs specifying the applicable §5.1.4(a)-(h) terms; the policy and supplier practice are reviewed at planned intervals and after significant changes/incidents per §5.1.6-5.1.7

    Which §5.1.4 contract terms are 'appropriate' for a given supplier, and the policy/practice review cadence, are entity-specific — draft placeholders pending compliance-expert definition.

Draft — pending expert review

Last verified against primary law 23 Jul 2026

NIS2-IMPL-5.2 · Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 — NIS2 Art 21(2) technical requirements, Annex §5.2

Directory of suppliers and service providers

Maintain and keep up to date a registry of direct suppliers and service providers, including a contact point for each and a list of the ICT products, ICT services and ICT processes each one provides to the entity.

Applicable now
Applies to
Digital infrastructure/service entities in Art 3 scope (DNS providers, TLD registries, cloud/data-centre/CDN providers, MSPs/MSSPs, online marketplaces, search engines, social platforms, trust services)
Severity if failed
Medium
Applies from
6 Nov 2024
Source
NIS2-implementing-2024-2690.txt:5167-5209

How this is verified

  • An up-to-date registry of direct suppliers/service providers exists, listing a contact point and the ICT products/services/processes each one provides

    The refresh cadence implied by 'kept up to date' is left to the entity to define — draft placeholder pending compliance-expert definition.

Draft — pending expert review

Last verified against primary law 23 Jul 2026

NIS2-IMPL-6.1 · Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 — NIS2 Art 21(2) technical requirements, Annex §6.1

Security in acquisition of ICT services and products

Set and implement processes to manage risks stemming from acquiring ICT services or products for components critical to the entity's network and information system security, based on the §2.1 risk assessment, throughout the supplier or service-provider relationship's life cycle. Processes cover: security requirements to apply to acquired ICT services/products; requirements for security updates throughout their lifetime or replacement after end of support; documentation of the hardware/software components used; documentation of implemented cybersecurity functions and the configuration required for secure operation; assurance that the ICT services/products comply with the stated security requirements; and validation methods confirming delivered ICT services/products meet those requirements, with the validation results documented. Reviewed and, where appropriate, updated at planned intervals and when significant incidents occur.

Applicable now
Applies to
Digital infrastructure/service entities in Art 3 scope (DNS providers, TLD registries, cloud/data-centre/CDN providers, MSPs/MSSPs, online marketplaces, search engines, social platforms, trust services)
Severity if failed
High
Applies from
6 Nov 2024
Source
NIS2-implementing-2024-2690.txt:5213-5389

How this is verified

  • Documented acquisition-risk-management processes exist covering the §6.1.2(a)-(f) elements for ICT services/products critical to N&IS security, and are reviewed at planned intervals or after significant incidents

    Which components are 'critical' and the review cadence are entity-specific — draft placeholders pending compliance-expert definition.

Draft — pending expert review

Last verified against primary law 23 Jul 2026

NIS2-IMPL-6.10 · Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 — NIS2 Art 21(2) technical requirements, Annex §6.10

Vulnerability handling and disclosure

Obtain information about technical vulnerabilities in network and information systems, evaluate exposure, and take appropriate management measures: monitor vulnerability information through appropriate channels (CSIRTs, competent authorities, supplier/service-provider information); perform vulnerability scans where appropriate with recorded evidence at planned intervals; address vulnerabilities identified as critical to operations without undue delay; ensure vulnerability handling is compatible with change management, security patch management, risk management and incident management procedures; and lay down a vulnerability-disclosure procedure consistent with the applicable national coordinated vulnerability disclosure policy. Where justified by potential impact, create and implement a mitigation plan; otherwise document and substantiate why remediation isn't required. Monitoring channels are reviewed and, where appropriate, updated at planned intervals.

Applicable now
Applies to
Digital infrastructure/service entities in Art 3 scope (DNS providers, TLD registries, cloud/data-centre/CDN providers, MSPs/MSSPs, online marketplaces, search engines, social platforms, trust services)
Severity if failed
High
Applies from
6 Nov 2024
Source
NIS2-implementing-2024-2690.txt:6578-6755

How this is verified

  • Vulnerability information is actively monitored through appropriate channels, exposure is evaluated with scans where appropriate, critical vulnerabilities are addressed without undue delay, handling is integrated with related management procedures, and a coordinated-disclosure procedure exists; each vulnerability either has a documented mitigation plan or a documented no-remediation justification

    The scan cadence and 'critical to operations' threshold are entity-specific — draft placeholders pending compliance-expert definition.

Draft — pending expert review

Last verified against primary law 23 Jul 2026

NIS2-IMPL-6.2 · Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 — NIS2 Art 21(2) technical requirements, Annex §6.2

Secure development life cycle

Before developing a network and information system (including software), lay down and apply secure-development rules covering all development phases — specification, design, development, implementation and testing — for both in-house and outsourced development. This includes: security-requirements analysis at the specification/design phases of any development or acquisition project; secure-engineering and secure-coding principles such as cybersecurity-by-design and zero-trust architectures; security requirements for development environments; security testing processes within the development life cycle; appropriate selection, protection and management of security test data; and sanitisation/anonymisation of test data per the §2.1 risk assessment. Outsourced development additionally applies the §5 supply-chain and §6.1 acquisition policies/procedures. Rules are reviewed and, where necessary, updated at planned intervals.

Applicable now
Applies to
Digital infrastructure/service entities in Art 3 scope (DNS providers, TLD registries, cloud/data-centre/CDN providers, MSPs/MSSPs, online marketplaces, search engines, social platforms, trust services)
Severity if failed
High
Applies from
6 Nov 2024
Source
NIS2-implementing-2024-2690.txt:5390-5586

How this is verified

  • Documented secure-development rules exist covering all development phases and the §6.2.2(a)-(f) elements, apply to both in-house and outsourced development (with §5/§6.1 additionally applied for outsourcing), and are reviewed at planned intervals

    The review cadence ('planned intervals') is left to the entity to define — draft placeholder pending compliance-expert input.

Draft — pending expert review

Last verified against primary law 23 Jul 2026

NIS2-IMPL-6.3 · Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 — NIS2 Art 21(2) technical requirements, Annex §6.3

Configuration management

Take appropriate measures to establish, document, implement and monitor configurations — including security configurations — of hardware, software, services and networks: laying down and ensuring secure configurations, and laying down and implementing processes/tools to enforce those configurations for newly installed systems and for systems in operation over their lifetime. Configurations are reviewed and, where appropriate, updated at planned intervals or when significant incidents or significant operational/risk changes occur.

Applicable now
Applies to
Digital infrastructure/service entities in Art 3 scope (DNS providers, TLD registries, cloud/data-centre/CDN providers, MSPs/MSSPs, online marketplaces, search engines, social platforms, trust services)
Severity if failed
High
Applies from
6 Nov 2024
Source
NIS2-implementing-2024-2690.txt:5587-5687

How this is verified

  • Documented, monitored security configurations exist for hardware/software/services/networks, enforced via defined processes/tools for both newly installed and in-operation systems, and reviewed at planned intervals or after significant incidents/changes

    The review cadence is entity-defined — draft placeholder pending compliance-expert input.

Draft — pending expert review

Last verified against primary law 23 Jul 2026

NIS2-IMPL-6.4 · Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 — NIS2 Art 21(2) technical requirements, Annex §6.4

Change management, repairs and maintenance

Apply change management procedures — consistent with the entity's general change-management policies where applicable — to control changes to network and information systems, covering releases, modifications and emergency changes to software/hardware in operation and configuration changes; changes must be documented and, based on the §2.1 risk assessment, tested and impact-assessed before implementation. Where an emergency prevents following the regular procedure, the entity documents the change's result and the reason the procedure could not be followed. Procedures are reviewed and, where appropriate, updated at planned intervals and when significant incidents or significant operational/risk changes occur.

Applicable now
Applies to
Digital infrastructure/service entities in Art 3 scope (DNS providers, TLD registries, cloud/data-centre/CDN providers, MSPs/MSSPs, online marketplaces, search engines, social platforms, trust services)
Severity if failed
High
Applies from
6 Nov 2024
Source
NIS2-implementing-2024-2690.txt:5688-5770

How this is verified

  • Documented change management procedures exist covering releases/modifications/emergency changes with pre-implementation testing and impact assessment, emergency deviations are documented with justification, and procedures are reviewed at planned intervals or after significant incidents/changes

    Review cadence is entity-defined — draft placeholder pending compliance-expert input.

Draft — pending expert review

Last verified against primary law 23 Jul 2026

NIS2-IMPL-6.5 · Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 — NIS2 Art 21(2) technical requirements, Annex §6.5

Security testing

Establish, implement and apply a security testing policy and procedures: determine the need, scope, frequency and type of security tests based on the §2.1 risk assessment; carry out tests per a documented methodology covering components identified as relevant to secure operation; document the type, scope, time and results of tests including a criticality assessment and mitigating actions per finding; and apply mitigating actions for critical findings. The policy is reviewed and, where appropriate, updated at planned intervals.

Applicable now
Applies to
Digital infrastructure/service entities in Art 3 scope (DNS providers, TLD registries, cloud/data-centre/CDN providers, MSPs/MSSPs, online marketplaces, search engines, social platforms, trust services)
Severity if failed
High
Applies from
6 Nov 2024
Source
NIS2-implementing-2024-2690.txt:5771-5909

How this is verified

  • A documented security testing policy and methodology exist, tests are scoped/scheduled per the risk assessment, results and mitigating actions are documented, and critical findings receive mitigating action

    Test frequency/type thresholds and the review cadence are entity-specific — draft placeholders pending compliance-expert definition.

Draft — pending expert review

Last verified against primary law 23 Jul 2026

NIS2-IMPL-6.6 · Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 — NIS2 Art 21(2) technical requirements, Annex §6.6

Security patch management

Specify and apply patch-management procedures, coherent with change management, vulnerability management, risk management and other relevant procedures, ensuring: security patches are applied within a reasonable time after becoming available; patches are tested before production deployment; patches come from trusted sources and are integrity-checked; and additional measures with residual-risk acceptance apply where a patch is unavailable or not applied. By derogation, an entity may choose not to apply a patch when the disadvantages outweigh the cybersecurity benefits — such a decision must be documented and substantiated.

Applicable now
Applies to
Digital infrastructure/service entities in Art 3 scope (DNS providers, TLD registries, cloud/data-centre/CDN providers, MSPs/MSSPs, online marketplaces, search engines, social platforms, trust services)
Severity if failed
High
Applies from
6 Nov 2024
Source
NIS2-implementing-2024-2690.txt:5910-6028

How this is verified

  • Patch-management procedures exist ensuring timely, tested, integrity-checked patch application coherent with change/vulnerability/risk management, with any non-application decision documented and substantiated

    What counts as a 'reasonable time' to apply a patch is entity/risk-specific — draft placeholder pending compliance-expert definition of a concrete SLA.

Draft — pending expert review

Last verified against primary law 23 Jul 2026

NIS2-IMPL-6.7 · Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 — NIS2 Art 21(2) technical requirements, Annex §6.7

Network security

Take appropriate measures to protect network and information systems from cyber threats: document the network architecture in a comprehensible, up-to-date manner; determine and apply controls protecting internal network domains from unauthorised access; configure controls preventing unnecessary access/communication; determine and apply remote-access controls, including for service providers; keep security-policy administration systems separate from other uses; forbid or deactivate unneeded connections and services; where appropriate, restrict network access to authorised devices; allow service-provider connections only via time-boxed authorisation requests; use trusted, isolated channels (logical, cryptographic or physical separation with assured endpoint identification and protection from modification/disclosure) between distinct systems; adopt and accelerate an implementation plan for transitioning to latest-generation network-layer protocols; adopt and accelerate an implementation plan for modern, interoperable secure e-mail communication standards; and apply DNS security and Internet routing security/hygiene best practices. Measures are reviewed and, where appropriate, updated at planned intervals and after significant incidents or changes.

Applicable now
Applies to
Digital infrastructure/service entities in Art 3 scope (DNS providers, TLD registries, cloud/data-centre/CDN providers, MSPs/MSSPs, online marketplaces, search engines, social platforms, trust services)
Severity if failed
High
Applies from
6 Nov 2024
Source
NIS2-implementing-2024-2690.txt:6029-6319

How this is verified

  • Network architecture is documented and current, access/communication controls per §6.7.2(a)-(l) are implemented, and measures are reviewed at planned intervals or after significant incidents/changes

    The transition-plan timelines for network-layer protocols and e-mail security standards (§6.7.2(j)-(k)) are entity-specific — draft placeholders pending compliance-expert definition of concrete milestones.

Draft — pending expert review

Last verified against primary law 23 Jul 2026

NIS2-IMPL-6.8 · Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 — NIS2 Art 21(2) technical requirements, Annex §6.8

Network segmentation

Segment systems into networks or zones per the §2.1 risk assessment, and segment the entity's own systems/networks from third parties' systems/networks — considering the functional, logical and physical relationship (including location) between trustworthy systems/services; granting zone access based on an assessment of security requirements; keeping operation- or safety-critical systems in secured zones; deploying a demilitarised zone for communications originating from or destined to the entity's networks; restricting inter/intra-zone access and communication to what's necessary for operation or safety; separating the network-administration network from the operational network; segregating network-administration channels from other traffic; and separating production systems (including backups) from development/testing systems. Segmentation is reviewed and, where appropriate, updated at planned intervals and after significant incidents or changes.

Applicable now
Applies to
Digital infrastructure/service entities in Art 3 scope (DNS providers, TLD registries, cloud/data-centre/CDN providers, MSPs/MSSPs, online marketplaces, search engines, social platforms, trust services)
Severity if failed
High
Applies from
6 Nov 2024
Source
NIS2-implementing-2024-2690.txt:6320-6534

How this is verified

  • Risk-assessment-based network segmentation exists implementing the §6.8.2(a)-(h) elements (including production/dev-test separation and admin-network isolation), and is reviewed at planned intervals or after significant incidents/changes

    Zone boundaries and 'critical to operation or safety' classification are entity-specific — draft placeholders pending compliance-expert definition.

Draft — pending expert review

Last verified against primary law 23 Jul 2026

NIS2-IMPL-6.9 · Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 — NIS2 Art 21(2) technical requirements, Annex §6.9

Protection against malicious and unauthorised software

Protect network and information systems against malicious and unauthorised software, in particular by implementing measures that detect or prevent its use — where appropriate, equipping systems with detection-and-response software that is regularly updated per the §2.1 risk assessment and the contractual agreements with providers.

Applicable now
Applies to
Digital infrastructure/service entities in Art 3 scope (DNS providers, TLD registries, cloud/data-centre/CDN providers, MSPs/MSSPs, online marketplaces, search engines, social platforms, trust services)
Severity if failed
High
Applies from
6 Nov 2024
Source
NIS2-implementing-2024-2690.txt:6535-6577

How this is verified

  • Detection/prevention measures for malicious and unauthorised software are implemented, with detection-and-response software equipped where appropriate and kept regularly updated

    Update frequency and which systems require detection-and-response software 'where appropriate' are entity-specific — draft placeholders pending compliance-expert definition.

Draft — pending expert review

Last verified against primary law 23 Jul 2026

NIS2-IMPL-7 · Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 — NIS2 Art 21(2) technical requirements, Annex §7

Effectiveness assessment of cybersecurity risk-management measures

Establish, implement and apply a policy and procedures to assess whether the entity's cybersecurity risk-management measures are effectively implemented and maintained — taking into account the §2.1 risk assessment results and past significant incidents. The policy and procedures determine which measures (including processes and controls) are monitored and measured, the methods for monitoring, measurement, analysis and evaluation to ensure valid results, when monitoring/measuring is performed, who is responsible for it, when results are analysed and evaluated, and who does that analysis. Reviewed and, where appropriate, updated at planned intervals and when significant incidents or significant operational/risk changes occur.

Applicable now
Applies to
Digital infrastructure/service entities in Art 3 scope (DNS providers, TLD registries, cloud/data-centre/CDN providers, MSPs/MSSPs, online marketplaces, search engines, social platforms, trust services)
Severity if failed
Medium
Applies from
6 Nov 2024
Source
NIS2-implementing-2024-2690.txt:6756-6932

How this is verified

  • A documented policy and procedures exist to assess the effectiveness of cybersecurity risk-management measures, informed by the risk assessment and past incidents, specifying what is monitored/measured, the methods, timing, and responsible/evaluating parties per §7.2(a)-(f); reviewed at planned intervals or after significant incidents/changes

    The monitoring/measurement cadence and specific methods are entity-defined — draft placeholders pending compliance-expert input.

Draft — pending expert review

Last verified against primary law 23 Jul 2026

NIS2-IMPL-8.1 · Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 — NIS2 Art 21(2) technical requirements, Annex §8.1

Awareness raising and basic cyber hygiene practices

Ensure employees (including members of management bodies) and, where appropriate per §5.1.4, direct suppliers and service providers are aware of risks, informed of the importance of cybersecurity, and apply cyber hygiene practices — via an awareness-raising programme that is scheduled over time to repeat and reach new employees, established in line with the network-and-information-system security policy, topic-specific policies and procedures, and covers relevant cyber threats, the cybersecurity risk-management measures in place, contact points and resources for further advice, and cyber hygiene practices for users. Where appropriate, the programme's effectiveness is tested; it is updated and offered at planned intervals accounting for changes in cyber hygiene practices, the threat landscape and entity-specific risk.

Applicable now
Applies to
Digital infrastructure/service entities in Art 3 scope (DNS providers, TLD registries, cloud/data-centre/CDN providers, MSPs/MSSPs, online marketplaces, search engines, social platforms, trust services)
Severity if failed
Medium
Applies from
6 Nov 2024
Source
NIS2-implementing-2024-2690.txt:6936-7055

How this is verified

  • An awareness-raising programme exists covering employees/management and suppliers where appropriate, is scheduled to repeat and reach new employees, aligns with the entity's N&IS policies, and covers the §8.1.2(a)-(c) content; effectiveness is tested where appropriate and the programme is updated at planned intervals

    Programme cadence and 'where appropriate' effectiveness-testing triggers are entity-specific — draft placeholders pending compliance-expert definition.

Draft — pending expert review

Last verified against primary law 23 Jul 2026

NIS2-IMPL-8.2 · Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 — NIS2 Art 21(2) technical requirements, Annex §8.2

Security training for security-relevant roles

Identify employees whose roles require security-relevant skills and expertise, and ensure they receive regular network-and-information-system security training, via a training programme established in line with the N&IS security policy, topic-specific policies and procedures that lays down role-based training needs by criteria. Training must be relevant to the employee's job function, have its effectiveness assessed, account for security measures in place, and cover secure configuration/operation instructions (including mobile devices), known cyber threat briefings, and behaviour during security-relevant events. Training is applied when staff transfer into security-relevant roles, and the programme is updated and run periodically accounting for applicable policies/rules, assigned roles and responsibilities, known threats and technological developments.

Applicable now
Applies to
Digital infrastructure/service entities in Art 3 scope (DNS providers, TLD registries, cloud/data-centre/CDN providers, MSPs/MSSPs, online marketplaces, search engines, social platforms, trust services)
Severity if failed
Medium
Applies from
6 Nov 2024
Source
NIS2-implementing-2024-2690.txt:7056-7215

How this is verified

  • Security-relevant roles are identified with a role-based training programme aligned to N&IS policy, training covers the §8.2.3(a)-(c) content with assessed effectiveness, role-transfer training is applied, and the programme is updated periodically

    Training frequency ('regular'/'periodically') and role-identification criteria are entity-specific — draft placeholders pending compliance-expert definition.

Draft — pending expert review

Last verified against primary law 23 Jul 2026

NIS2-IMPL-9 · Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 — NIS2 Art 21(2) technical requirements, Annex §9

Cryptography policy and key management

Establish, implement and apply a policy and procedures on cryptography to ensure adequate and effective use of cryptography protecting the confidentiality, authenticity and integrity of data, in line with asset classification and the §2.1 risk assessment. The policy and procedures establish, per asset classification: the type, strength and quality of cryptographic measures required for data at rest and in transit; the protocols/algorithms, cipher strength, cryptographic solutions and usage practices to approve and require, following a cryptographic agility approach where appropriate; and the entity's key-management approach, covering (where appropriate) key generation, certificate issuance/obtaining, key distribution/activation, key storage/access, key change/update, compromised-key handling, key revocation, lost/corrupted key recovery, key backup/archiving, key destruction, logging/auditing of key-management activity, and key activation/deactivation date-setting. Reviewed and, where appropriate, updated at planned intervals accounting for the state of the art in cryptography.

Applicable now
Applies to
Digital infrastructure/service entities in Art 3 scope (DNS providers, TLD registries, cloud/data-centre/CDN providers, MSPs/MSSPs, online marketplaces, search engines, social platforms, trust services)
Severity if failed
High
Applies from
6 Nov 2024
Source
NIS2-implementing-2024-2690.txt:7216-7563

How this is verified

  • A cryptography policy and procedures exist specifying required cryptographic strength/protocols by asset classification and a key-management approach covering the applicable §9.2(c)(i)-(xii) lifecycle stages, and are reviewed at planned intervals accounting for the state of the art

    Which specific algorithms/key-lifecycle methods are 'appropriate' is entity/risk-specific — draft placeholder pending compliance-expert definition.

Draft — pending expert review

Last verified against primary law 23 Jul 2026